Expert Panel on Equalization and Territorial Financial Financing
Home > Consultations > Issues Paper Printer Friendly | Français

Key Issues for the Review of Equalization and Territorial Formula Financing

2. What are Equalization and Territorial Formula Financing (TFF)?

Equalization and TFF are federal cash transfers to provincial and territorial governments. Their purpose is to give provinces and territories the financial means to offer their residents reasonably comparable public services, at reasonably comparable levels of taxation. In the absence of these programs, the residents of less wealthy provinces and territories would face higher tax burdens and/or lower levels of public services than those of wealthier regions.

The two programs resemble a federal "revenue- supplementation scheme" for provincial and territorial governments. They are formula-based and fill the shortfall between the revenues provinces and territories could raise on their own (at typical levels of taxation) and the revenues required to provide reasonably comparable public services to their residents.

The Equalization program has, since 1982, set that standard of required revenues per person as that of the five ‘'middle-rich" provinces in Canada (B.C., Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario and Quebec), using average tax rates and defining their tax bases in a typical fashion. For instance, as shown in figure 1, the Equalization formula calculated that in 2004-05 every province required about $6,200 per person to provide reasonably comparable public services. This is called the "five-province standard" of Equalization. The program calculates what each province would be able to raise through typical levels of taxation (commonly called ‘'own-source revenue capacity"), and any shortfall relative to the standard is paid out in Equalization. Note that, after Equalization, all receiving provinces have been raised to the same per capita standard of $6,200. Provinces above the standard are not entitled to any Equalization (Alberta and Ontario). Nor are they called upon to contribute any of their revenues to help pay for Equalization, or to reduce further the disparities that remain even after Equalization.

Figure 1: Equalization of own-source revenue capacities under the existing Equalization formula, 2004-05

Equalization of own-source revenue capacities under the existing Equalization formula, 2004-05

Equalization: Defining its Terms

Revenue or Fiscal Capacity
The amount of revenue per person a provincial or territorial government would be able to raise, were it to levy typical rates of taxation (e.g. the average national tax rate) on the various revenue bases typically used by such governments to raise revenue. The resulting revenue is often called the "own-source revenue capacity" of a province or territory. Comparisons of revenue capacity must rely on standardized definitions of revenue bases. For instance, a province that does not levy a sales tax is still deemed to be able to tax its sales base.

Equalization Standard
The level of revenue capacity, expressed in dollars per person, to which eligible governments are raised.

Equalization Payments
The shortfall, if any, between the Equalization standard (identical for all provinces) and each province's revenue capacity.

Equalizing Grants
The general family of intergovernmental transfers such as Equalization or TFF, which are intended to ensure governments have sufficient revenues for delivering reasonably comparable public services at reasonably comparable levels of taxation.

Figure 2: Equalization of disparities in overall fiscal need under Territorial Formula Financing

Equalization of disparities in overall fiscal need under Territorial Formula Financing

Legend Gross expenditure base ("expenditure need") Legend Own-Source revenue capacity Legend Federal transfers (other than TFF)


TFF: Defining its Terms

Expenditure Need
The concept of expenditure need is used in TFF but not in Equalization. In theory, it should measure what a government would have to spend, if it were to provide basic public services of reasonably comparable quality to those typically provided by other governments. Need takes into account both the demand, as well as the costs of providing public services. For instance, spending need in education would take into account the size of the school-age population, the percentage of children with special needs, as well as the costs of teachers and school facilities in a province or territory.

In practice, TFF relies on a very simple approximation of expenditure need (see below).

Gross Expenditure Base (GEB)
Refers to the methodology by which the expenditure needs of each territory are approximated in order to determine their TFF grants. The GEB is based on a cross-section of territorial needs as measured by territorial spending in 1982 and adjusted to take into account economic and population growth since then.

Eligible Revenues
A measure of the potential own-source revenues of each territory, to which are added some of the other federal transfers it receives.

Fiscal Needs/TFF Grants
The difference between a Territory's expenditure need (as measured by the GEB for TFF) and its "eligible revenues". Annual TFF grants are normally equal to each territory's fiscal needs (unless a budget constraint such as a ceiling prevents the grants from meeting all the fiscal needs of a territory).

Equalization Entitlements 1993-94 to 2005-06 ($ millions)

YEAR NFLD PEI NS NB QUE ONT MAN SASK ALTA BC TOTAL
1993-94 900 175 889 835 3,878 0 901 486 0 0 8,063
1994-95 958 192 1,065 927 3,965 0 1,085 413 0 0 8,607
1995-96 932 192 1,137 876 4,307 0 1,051 264 0 0 8,759
1996-97 1030 208 1,182 1,019 4,169 0 1,126 224 0 0 8,959
1997-98 1093 238 1,302 1,112 4,745 0 1,053 196 0 0 9,738
1998-99 1068 238 1,221 1,112 4,394 0 1,092 477 0 0 9,602
1999-00 1169 255 1,290 1,183 5,280 0 1,219 379 0 125 10,900
2000-01 1112 269 1,404 1,260 5,380 0 1,314 208 0 0 10,948
2001-02 1055 256 1,315 1,202 4,679 0 1,362 200 0 240 10,310
2002-03 875 235 1,122 1,143 4,004 0 1,303 106 0 71 8,859
2003-04 766 232 1,130 1,142 3,764 0 1,336 0 0 320 8,690
2004-05 762 277 1,313 1,326 4,155 0 1,607 652 0 682 10,774
2005-06 861 277 1,344 1,348 4,798 0 1,601 82 0 590 10,900

Territorial Formula Financing Transfers ($ millions)

YEAR YUKON NWT NUNAVUT TOTAL
1993-94 289 861 0 1,150
1994-95 289 889 0 1,178
1995-96 292 904 0 1,196
1996-97 289 908 0 1,197
1997-98 307 921 0 1,228
1998-99 310 935 0 1,245
1999-00 319 493 520 1,332
2000-01 336 310 566 1,212
2001-02 356 543 611 1,510
2002-03 374 592 659 1,625
2003-04 430 600 687 1,717
2004-05 466 678 756 1,900
2005-06 487 714 799 2,000

Key differences between Equalization and TFF

  • TFF currently represents between 71% and 86% of territorial revenues, whereas Equalization accounts for a much lower percentage of provincial revenues (currently ranging from 2% to 27%).
  • The current TFF approximates expenditure needs for each Territory, whereas Equalization does not measure expenditure need.
  • TFF, when measuring revenue potential, takes into account several federal transfers received, as well as own-source revenues.

Similarly, TFF seeks to provide territorial governments with sufficient revenue to offer their residents basic services that are reasonably comparable to those available to other Canadians, taking into account their particular spending requirements and the higher costs of delivering public services in the North. TFF works like Equalization, although it defines a different standard of required revenues for each Territory, to reflect the disparities in their relative expenditure needs (due to differences in population densities and other factors).

Equalization will pay out in total close to $11 billion in 2005-06 and the TFF $2 billion. Per resident, Equalization payments will range from about $80 in Saskatchewan to over $600 in Quebec and nearly $2,000 in Prince Edward Island. The size of these payments reflects how far each province is from the standard. TFF payments are much higher, in recognition of greater Northern needs and smaller more dispersed populations, ranging from $15,000 per capita in the Yukon to $25,000 in Nunavut.

The overall importance of Equalization payments as a proportion of gross provincial revenues differs greatly across the country, ranging in 2004-05 from under 10% in Quebec to over 20% in the Atlantic provinces. The importance of TFF in the Territories is an order of magnitude higher, ranging from 70%-75% for the Yukon and NWT to over 85% for Nunavut.

Both Equalization and TFF are federal programs, financed by the federal taxes collected from all Canadians. They are not funded by provincial or territorial governments themselves.

The principles underlying Equalization have a long history going back to the recommendations of the Rowell-Sirois Commission on the eve of the Second World War and to the subsequent legislation creating Equalization in 1957. More recently, in 1982, the "principle of making Equalization payments" was set out in Canada's Constitution. The program is given effect through federal legislation that has traditionally been renewed every five years, after extensive federal-provincial consultations.

TFF has taken the form of five-year intergovernmental agreements, but has recently come under federal legislation, when Parliament passed the legislation giving effect to the October 2004 New Framework for Equalization and TFF (see section 5).

THE CONSTITUTION ACT, 1982
EQUALIZATION AND REGIONAL DISPARITIES

1. Without altering the legislative authority of Parliament or of the provincial legislatures, or the rights of any of them with respect to the exercise of their legislative authority, Parliament and the legislatures, together with the government of Canada and the provincial governments, are committed to

  1. promoting equal opportunities for the well-being of Canadians;
  2. furthering economic development to reduce disparity in opportunities; and
  3. providing essential public services of reasonable quality to all Canadians.

2. Parliament and the government of Canada are committed to the principle of making equalization payments to ensure that provincial governments have sufficient revenues to provide reasonably comparable levels of public services at reasonably comparable levels of taxation.

Equalization and TFF seek to provide provinces and territories with sufficient revenue to offer Canadians health care, education, social, roads and transportation services that are reasonably comparable, at reasonably comparable rates of taxation, wherever they live. That is why the two programs have come to symbolize the commitment to equality of opportunity and sharing, which binds Canadians together.

Previous Table of Contents Next

Last Updated: 2010-09-06 Top of page Important Notices