|
Key Issues for the Review of Equalization and Territorial Formula Financing
2. What are Equalization and Territorial Formula Financing (TFF)?
Equalization and TFF are federal cash transfers to provincial and territorial
governments. Their purpose is to give provinces and territories the financial
means to offer their residents reasonably comparable public services, at reasonably
comparable levels of taxation. In the absence of these programs, the residents
of less wealthy provinces and territories would face higher tax burdens and/or
lower levels of public services than those of wealthier regions.
The two programs resemble a federal "revenue- supplementation scheme"
for provincial and territorial governments. They are formula-based and fill
the shortfall between the revenues provinces and territories could raise on
their own (at typical levels of taxation) and the revenues required to provide
reasonably comparable public services to their residents.
The Equalization program has, since 1982, set that standard of required revenues
per person as that of the five ‘'middle-rich" provinces in
Canada (B.C., Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario and Quebec), using average tax
rates and defining their tax bases in a typical fashion. For instance, as shown
in figure 1, the Equalization formula calculated that in 2004-05 every province
required about $6,200 per person to provide reasonably comparable public services.
This is called the "five-province standard" of Equalization. The
program calculates what each province would be able to raise through typical
levels of taxation (commonly called ‘'own-source revenue capacity"),
and any shortfall relative to the standard is paid out in Equalization. Note
that, after Equalization, all receiving provinces have been raised to the same
per capita standard of $6,200. Provinces above the standard are not entitled
to any Equalization (Alberta and Ontario). Nor are they called upon to contribute
any of their revenues to help pay for Equalization, or to reduce further the
disparities that remain even after Equalization.
Figure 1: Equalization of own-source revenue capacities under the existing
Equalization formula, 2004-05
 |
Equalization: Defining its Terms
Revenue or Fiscal Capacity
The amount of revenue per person a provincial or territorial
government would be able to raise, were it to levy typical rates of taxation
(e.g. the average national tax rate) on the various revenue bases typically
used by such governments to raise revenue. The resulting revenue is often
called the "own-source revenue capacity" of a province or
territory. Comparisons of revenue capacity must rely on standardized definitions
of revenue bases. For instance, a province that does not levy a sales
tax is still deemed to be able to tax its sales base.
Equalization Standard
The level of revenue capacity, expressed in dollars per person,
to which eligible governments are raised.
Equalization Payments
The shortfall, if any, between the Equalization standard (identical
for all provinces) and each province's revenue capacity.
Equalizing Grants
The general family of intergovernmental transfers such as Equalization
or TFF, which are intended to ensure governments have sufficient revenues
for delivering reasonably comparable public services at reasonably comparable
levels of taxation.
|
Figure 2: Equalization of disparities in overall fiscal need under
Territorial Formula Financing
TFF: Defining its Terms Expenditure
Need
The concept of expenditure need is used in TFF but not in Equalization.
In theory, it should measure what a government would have to spend, if
it were to provide basic public services of reasonably comparable quality
to those typically provided by other governments. Need takes into account
both the demand, as well as the costs of providing public services. For
instance, spending need in education would take into account the size
of the school-age population, the percentage of children with special
needs, as well as the costs of teachers and school facilities in a province
or territory.
In practice, TFF relies on a very simple approximation of expenditure
need (see below).
Gross Expenditure Base (GEB)
Refers to the methodology by which the expenditure needs of each
territory are approximated in order to determine their TFF grants. The
GEB is based on a cross-section of territorial needs as measured by territorial
spending in 1982 and adjusted to take into account economic and population
growth since then.
Eligible Revenues
A measure of the potential own-source revenues of each territory,
to which are added some of the other federal transfers it receives.
Fiscal Needs/TFF Grants
The difference between a Territory's expenditure need (as
measured by the GEB for TFF) and its "eligible revenues".
Annual TFF grants are normally equal to each territory's fiscal
needs (unless a budget constraint such as a ceiling prevents the grants
from meeting all the fiscal needs of a territory).
|
Equalization Entitlements 1993-94 to 2005-06
($ millions)
| YEAR |
NFLD |
PEI |
NS |
NB |
QUE |
ONT |
MAN |
SASK |
ALTA |
BC |
TOTAL |
| 1993-94 |
900 |
175 |
889 |
835 |
3,878 |
0 |
901 |
486 |
0 |
0 |
8,063 |
| 1994-95 |
958 |
192 |
1,065 |
927 |
3,965 |
0 |
1,085 |
413 |
0 |
0 |
8,607 |
| 1995-96 |
932 |
192 |
1,137 |
876 |
4,307 |
0 |
1,051 |
264 |
0 |
0 |
8,759 |
| 1996-97 |
1030 |
208 |
1,182 |
1,019 |
4,169 |
0 |
1,126 |
224 |
0 |
0 |
8,959 |
| 1997-98 |
1093 |
238 |
1,302 |
1,112 |
4,745 |
0 |
1,053 |
196 |
0 |
0 |
9,738 |
| 1998-99 |
1068 |
238 |
1,221 |
1,112 |
4,394 |
0 |
1,092 |
477 |
0 |
0 |
9,602 |
| 1999-00 |
1169 |
255 |
1,290 |
1,183 |
5,280 |
0 |
1,219 |
379 |
0 |
125 |
10,900 |
| 2000-01 |
1112 |
269 |
1,404 |
1,260 |
5,380 |
0 |
1,314 |
208 |
0 |
0 |
10,948 |
| 2001-02 |
1055 |
256 |
1,315 |
1,202 |
4,679 |
0 |
1,362 |
200 |
0 |
240 |
10,310 |
| 2002-03 |
875 |
235 |
1,122 |
1,143 |
4,004 |
0 |
1,303 |
106 |
0 |
71 |
8,859 |
| 2003-04 |
766 |
232 |
1,130 |
1,142 |
3,764 |
0 |
1,336 |
0 |
0 |
320 |
8,690 |
| 2004-05 |
762 |
277 |
1,313 |
1,326 |
4,155 |
0 |
1,607 |
652 |
0 |
682 |
10,774 |
| 2005-06 |
861 |
277 |
1,344 |
1,348 |
4,798 |
0 |
1,601 |
82 |
0 |
590 |
10,900 |
Territorial Formula Financing Transfers
($ millions)
| YEAR |
YUKON |
NWT |
NUNAVUT |
TOTAL |
| 1993-94 |
289 |
861 |
0 |
1,150 |
| 1994-95 |
289 |
889 |
0 |
1,178 |
| 1995-96 |
292 |
904 |
0 |
1,196 |
| 1996-97 |
289 |
908 |
0 |
1,197 |
| 1997-98 |
307 |
921 |
0 |
1,228 |
| 1998-99 |
310 |
935 |
0 |
1,245 |
| 1999-00 |
319 |
493 |
520 |
1,332 |
| 2000-01 |
336 |
310 |
566 |
1,212 |
| 2001-02 |
356 |
543 |
611 |
1,510 |
| 2002-03 |
374 |
592 |
659 |
1,625 |
| 2003-04 |
430 |
600 |
687 |
1,717 |
| 2004-05 |
466 |
678 |
756 |
1,900 |
| 2005-06 |
487 |
714 |
799 |
2,000 |
Key differences between Equalization and TFF
- TFF currently represents between 71% and 86% of territorial revenues,
whereas Equalization accounts for a much lower percentage of provincial
revenues (currently ranging from 2% to 27%).
- The current TFF approximates expenditure needs for each Territory,
whereas Equalization does not measure expenditure need.
- TFF, when measuring revenue potential, takes into account several
federal transfers received, as well as own-source revenues.
|
Similarly, TFF seeks to provide territorial governments with sufficient revenue
to offer their residents basic services that are reasonably comparable to those
available to other Canadians, taking into account their particular spending
requirements and the higher costs of delivering public services in the North.
TFF works like Equalization, although it defines a different standard of required
revenues for each Territory, to reflect the disparities in their relative expenditure
needs (due to differences in population densities and other factors).
Equalization will pay out in total close to $11 billion in 2005-06 and the
TFF $2 billion. Per resident, Equalization payments will range from about $80
in Saskatchewan to over $600 in Quebec and nearly $2,000 in Prince Edward Island.
The size of these payments reflects how far each province is from the standard.
TFF payments are much higher, in recognition of greater Northern needs and smaller
more dispersed populations, ranging from $15,000 per capita in the Yukon to
$25,000 in Nunavut.
The overall importance of Equalization payments as a proportion of gross provincial
revenues differs greatly across the country, ranging in 2004-05 from under 10%
in Quebec to over 20% in the Atlantic provinces. The importance of TFF in the
Territories is an order of magnitude higher, ranging from 70%-75% for the Yukon
and NWT to over 85% for Nunavut.
Both Equalization and TFF are federal programs, financed by the federal taxes
collected from all Canadians. They are not funded by provincial or territorial
governments themselves.
The principles underlying Equalization have a long history going back to the
recommendations of the Rowell-Sirois Commission on the eve of the Second World
War and to the subsequent legislation creating Equalization in 1957. More recently,
in 1982, the "principle of making Equalization payments" was set
out in Canada's Constitution. The program is given effect through federal
legislation that has traditionally been renewed every five years, after extensive
federal-provincial consultations.
TFF has taken the form of five-year intergovernmental agreements, but has
recently come under federal legislation, when Parliament passed the legislation
giving effect to the October 2004 New Framework for Equalization and TFF (see
section 5).
THE CONSTITUTION ACT, 1982
EQUALIZATION AND REGIONAL DISPARITIES
1. Without altering the legislative authority of Parliament or of the
provincial legislatures, or the rights of any of them with respect to
the exercise of their legislative authority, Parliament and the legislatures,
together with the government of Canada and the provincial governments,
are committed to
- promoting equal opportunities for the well-being of Canadians;
- furthering economic development to reduce disparity in opportunities;
and
- providing essential public services of reasonable quality to all Canadians.
2. Parliament and the government of Canada are committed to the principle
of making equalization payments to ensure that provincial governments
have sufficient revenues to provide reasonably comparable levels of public
services at reasonably comparable levels of taxation. |
Equalization and TFF seek to provide provinces and territories with sufficient
revenue to offer Canadians health care, education, social, roads and transportation
services that are reasonably comparable, at reasonably comparable rates of taxation,
wherever they live. That is why the two programs have come to symbolize the
commitment to equality of opportunity and sharing, which binds Canadians together.
|