 |
| ACCUEIL |
| À PROPOS DU GROUPE |
| CONSULTATIONS |
| MÉMOIRES |
| RECHERCHE ET ANALYSE |
| COORDONNÉES |
| LIENS |
| Accueil > Résumé > Bibliographie | Version imprimable | English |
Bibliographie Atlantic Provinces Economic Council. Atlantic
Policy Forum on Equalization, 2005. Aubry, Jean-Pierre. Analyser le programme de péréquation dans un contexte plus large, 2005. http://www.eqtff-pfft.ca/submissions/AnalyserLeProgrammeDePerequation.pdf. Aubut, Julie, and Vaillancourt, François. Using GDP in Equalization Calculations: Are There Meaningful Measurement Issues? Institute of Intergovernmental Relations, Queen’s University, Working Paper 2002 (5). http://www.iigr.ca/pdf/publications/129_Using_GDP_in_Equalizatio.pdf. Aucoin, Peter; Smith, Jennifer; and Dinsdale, Geoff. Responsible Government: Clarifying Essentials, Dispelling Myths and Exploring Change. Canadian Centre for Management Development, 2004. Baldwin, John; Brown, Mark; Maynard, Jean-Pierre; and Zietsma, Danielle. Catching Up and Falling Behind: The Performance of Provincial GDP per capita from 1990 to 2003. Government of Canada, Statistics Canada, 2004. Banting, Keith G.; Brown, Douglas M.; and Courchene, Thomas J. (eds.) The Future of Fiscal Federalism. School of Policy Studies at Queen’s University, 1994. Barro, Stephen M. Macroeconomic Measures versus RTS Measures of Fiscal Capacity: Theoretical Foundations and Implications for Canada. Institute of Intergovernmental Relations, Queen’s University, Working Paper 2002 (7), 2002. Beale, Elizabeth. The Equalization Program: A
Perspective from Atlantic Canada. Institute of Intergovernmental Relations, Queen’s University, 2002. Bernard, Jean-Thomas, et Barla, Philippe. Kyoto et l’Équité Inter-provinciale. GREEN, Université Laval, 2005. http://www.green.ulaval.ca/annexe. Bernard, Jean-Thomas. Le marché québécois de
l’électricité : à la croisée des chemins.
Université Laval, 2005. Bird, Richard M., and Slack, Enid. Equalization: The Representative Tax System Revisited. Canadian Tax Journal 913-27, vol. 38, no. 4, 1990. Bird, Richard M., and Vaillancourt, François. Financing Decentralized Expenditures: An International Comparison of Grants. Cambridge University Press, 1998. Bird, Richard M., and Smart, Michael. Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers: Some Lessons from International Experience. Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, 2001. Boadway, Robin, and Flatters, Frank. The Efficiency Basis for Regional Employment Policy. Canadian Journal of Economics 58-77, vol. 14, no. 1, 1981. Boadway, Robin, and Flatters, Frank. Efficiency and Equalization Payments in a Federal System of Government: A Synthesis and Extension of Recent Results. Canadian Journal of Economics 613-33, vol. 15, no. 4, 1982. Boadway, Robin, and Flatters, Frank. Equalization in a Federal State: An Economic Analysis. Economic Council of Canada, 1982. Boadway, Robin, and Flatters, Frank. Efficiency, Equity and the Allocation of Resource Rents. Lexington Books, 99-123, 1983. Boadway Robin; Flatters, F.; and Leblanc, A. Revenue Sharing and the Equalization of Natural Resource Revenues. Canadian Public Policy, vol. 9, no. 2, 1983. Boadway, Robin, and Hobson, Paul A.R. Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in Canada. Canadian Tax Paper no. 96, chap. 3. Canadian Tax Foundation, 1993. Boadway, Robin. Review of “The Uneasy Case for Equalization Payments” by Dan Usher. National Tax Journal 677-86, vol. 49, no. 4, 1996. Boadway, Robin, and Hobson, Paul A.R. (eds.) Equalization: Its Contribution to Canada’s Economic and Fiscal Progress. McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1998. Boadway, Robin. Revisiting Equalization Again: RTS vs. Macro Approaches. Institute of Intergovernmental Relations, Queen’s University, Working Paper 2002(2), 2002. http://www.iigr.ca/pdf/publications/126_Revisiting_Equalization_.pdf. Boadway, Robin. The Vertical Fiscal Gap: Conceptions and Misconceptions. Institute of Intergovernmental Relations, Queen’s University, 2002. Boadway, Robin. Equalization at the Crossroads: Can it Cope with the Emerging Imbalances? Paper Prepared for the Atlantic Canada Economics Association Annual Meetings, Dalhousie University, October 2005. Boadway, Robin. Evaluating the Equalization Program: The Choice of the Standard in the RTS. Note for the Expert Panel on Equalization and Territorial Formula Financing. Queen’s University, 2005. http://www.eqtff-pfft.ca/ submissions/EvaluatingtheEqualizationProgram.pdf. Boessenkool, Kenneth J. Clearly Canadian: Improving Equity and Accountability with an Overarching Equalization Program. C. D. Howe Institute Commentary no. 114, C.D. Howe Institute, 1998. Boessenkool, Kenneth J. Taxing Incentives: How Equalization Distorts Tax Policy in Recipient Provinces. Atlantic Institute for Market Studies, 2002. http://www.aims.ca/library/incentives.pdf. Boessenkool, Kenneth J. Ten Reasons to Remove Non-Renewable Resources from Equalization. Atlantic Institute for Market Studies, 2002. http://www.aims.ca/library/tenreasons.pdf. Boessenkool, Kenneth J. Submission to the Expert Panel on Equalization and Territorial Formula Financing. Atlantic Institute for Market Studies, 2005. Boothe, Paul. Finding a Balance: Renewing Canadian Fiscal Federalism. C.D. Howe Institute Benefactors Lecture, 1998. http://www.cdhowe.org/pdf/Boothe.pdf. Boothe, Paul, and Hermanutz, Derek. Simply Sharing:
An Interprovincial Equalization Scheme for Canada. C.D. Howe Institute Commentary no. 128. 1999. Boothe, Paul. Modest but Meaningful Change: Reforming Equalization. Atlantic Institute for Market Studies, 2002. http://www.aims.ca/library/modest.pdf. Boothe, Paul. The Stabilization Properties of Equalization: Evidence from Saskatchewan. Institute of Intergovernmental Relations, Queen’s University, Working Paper 2002(3). http://www.iigr.ca/pdf/publications/127_The_Stabilization_Proper.pdf. Brett, Craig and Strain, Frank. Nine Theses on Equalization. Mount Allison University, June 2005. http://www.eqtff-pfft.ca/submissions/ThoughtsOnEqualization.pdf. Brown, Douglas M. Equalization on the Basis of Need in Canada. Institute of Intergovernmental Relations, Queen’s University, 1996. Buchanan, James M. Fiscal Equalization Revisited. Atlantic Institute for Market Studies, 2002. http://www.aims.ca/library/fiscal.pdf. Chowhan, James, and Prud-Homme, Marc. City Comparisons of Shelter Costs in Canada: A Hedonic Approach. Government of Canada, Statistics Canada, 2004. Clark, Douglas H. Assessing Provincial Revenue-Raising Capacity for Transfers. In Financing Decentralized Expenditure, E. Ahmad (ed.). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 1997. Conference Board of Canada. Equalization: Fix it Permanently and Fix it Nation-wide. Executive Action Report, 2005. Coulombe, Serge. Economic Growth and Provincial Disparity: A New View of an Old Canadian Problem. C.D. Howe Institute, 1999. http://www.cdhowe.org/pdf/coulombe.pdf. Council of the Federation. Strengthening the Equalization Program: Perspectives of the Finance Ministers of Provinces and Territories. 2003. Courchene, Thomas J., and Copplestone, Glen H. Alternative Equalization Programs: Two-Tier Systems. In Richard Bird (ed.) Fiscal Dimensions of Canadian Federalism, Canadian Tax Foundation, 8-45, supra note 44, 1980. Courchene, Thomas J. Equalization Payments: Past, Present and Future. Ontario Economic Council, 1984. Courchene, Thomas J. Renegotiating Equalization: National Policy, Federal State, International Economy. C.D. Howe Institute Commentary no. 113, 1998. Courchene, Thomas J. Confiscatory Equalization, The Intriguing Case of Saskatchewan’s Vanishing Energy Revenues. Institute for Research on Public Policy, Policy Options vol. 10, no. 2, 2004. http://www.irpp.org/choices/archive/vol10no2.pdf. Courchene,Thomas J. Hourglass Federalism – How The Feds Got The Provinces To Run Out of Money in a Decade of Liberal Budgets. Institute for Research on Public Policy, April 2004. http://www.irpp.org/po/archive/apr04/courchene.pdf. Courchene, Thomas J. Energy Prices, Equalization and Canadian Federalism. Institute for Research on Public Policy, Policy Options vol.26 (8), October 2005. Courchene, Thomas J. Equalization under the New Framework: Floating Standards vs Relativities. Queen’s University and Institute for Research on Public Policy, July 2005. http://www.eqtff-pfft.ca/submissions/CourcheneRelativities.pdf. Courchene, Thomas J. Resource Revenues and Equalization: Five-Province vs National-Average Standards, Alternatives to the Representative Tax System, and Revenue-Sharing Pools. Queen’s University and Institute for Research on Public Policy, 2005. Courchene, Thomas J. Vertical and Horizontal Fiscal Imbalances: An Ontario Perspective. Background Notes for a presentation to the Standing Senate Committee on National Finance, Senate of Canada, May 4, 2005. http://www.irpp.org/miscpubs/archive/tjc_050504.pdf. Dafflon, Bernard. Federal-Cantonal Equalization in Switzerland: An Overview of the Reform in Progress. BENEFRI Centre d’Études en Économie du Secteur Public (CÉÉP), Working Paper No. 356, May 27, 2004. http://www.unifr.ch/finpub/doc/WPfulltext/WorkingPaper356.pdf. Dafflon, Bernard. Le désenchevêtrement des tâches et la péréquation financière : les chantiers du fédéralisme suisse après le 28 novembre, 2004. Université de Fribourg, Suisse, Series FSES 385. Dalhby, Bev, and Wilson, L.S. Fiscal Capacity, Tax Effort, and Optimal Equalization Grants. Canadian Journal of Economics 657-72, vol. 27, no. 3, 1994. Dahlby, Bev. Fiscal Externalities and the Design of Intergovernmental Grants. International Tax and Public Finance 397-412, vol. 3, no. 3, 1996. Dahlby, Bev. The Incentive Effects of Fiscal Equalization Grants. Atlantic Institute for Market Studies, Paper no. 4, 2002. http://www.aims.ca/library/incentive.pdf. Dahlby, Bev. Dealing with Fiscal Imbalances: Vertical, Horizontal, and Structural. C.D. Howe Institute Working Paper, September 2005. http://www.cdhowe.org/pdf/workingpaper_3.pdf. Dahlby, Bev. Review of the Canadian Equalization and Territorial Funding System. University of Alberta, 2005. http://www.eqtff-pfft.ca/submissions/Dahlby.pdf. Dennison, Donald G. Submission to the Expert
Panel on Equalization and Territorial Formula
Financing 2005. Duclos, Jean-Yves, L’illusion du déséquilibre. La Presse. March 19, 2002. Duclos, Jean-Yves. Mémoire au Groupe d’Experts
sur la péréquation et la formule de financement
des territories. Université Laval, 2005. Economic Council of Canada. Financing Confederation: Today and Tomorrow. Ottawa: Supply and Services Canada, 1982. Feehan, James P. Equalization and the Challenge of Natural Resources. Queen’s University, 2002. http://www.iigr.ca/conferences/archive/pdfs2/Feehan.pdf. Feehan, James P. Equalization and the Provinces’ Natural Resource Revenues: Partial Equalization Can Work Better. In Harvey Lazar (ed.) Canadian Fiscal Arrangements: What Works, What Might Work Better. Institute of Intergovernmental Relations, Queen’s University, 2005. Finn, Jean-Guy. Le programme canadien de péréquation : pour un retour à l’essentiel. 2005. http://www.eqtff-pfft.ca/submissions/Finn.pdf. Flatters, Frank; Henderson, Vernon; and Mieszkowski, Peter. Public Goods, Efficiency, and Regional Fiscal Equalization. Journal of Public Economics 99-112, vol. 3, no. 2, 1974. Gainer, W.D., and Powrie, T.L. Public Revenue
from Canadian Crude Petroleum Production. Canadian Public Policy 1-12, Vol. 1, no.1, 1975. Gannon, J. Patrick. Responses to the Key Questions on Equalization Raised by the Expert Panel on Equalization, 2005. http://www.eqtff-pfft.ca/submissions/Gannon.pdf. Gibbins, Roger, and Vander Ploeg, Casey. Investing Wisely, an Investment Strategy for Creative Leadership. Canada West Foundation, 2005. http://www.cwf.ca/abcalcwf/doc.nsf/(Publications)/ Godbout, Luc, et St-Cerny, Suzie. La réforme fédérale proposée de la péréquation : le mauvais remède pour l’un des organes vitaux du fédéralisme fiscal canadien. Université de Sherbrooke, 2005. http://www.eqtff-pfft.ca/ Government of Canada. Report of the Royal Commission on Dominion-Provincial Relations. King’s Printer, 1940. Government of Canada. Report of the Parliamentary Task Force on Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements. House of Commons, Canada, 1981. Government of Canada. Report of the Royal Commission on the Economic Union and Development Prospects for Canada. The Macdonald Commission, 1985. Government of Canada. Report of the Auditor General of Canada to the House of Commons. Chapter 8, April and October, 1997. Government of Canada. Standing Senate Committee on National Finance. Senate of Canada. The Effectiveness of and Possible Improvements to the Present Equalization Policy. Fourteenth Report, 37th Parliament, 1st Session. 2002. http://www.parl.gc.ca/37/1/parlbus/commbus/ Government of Canada. Budget 2004, Annex 6. Renewing Equalization and Territorial Formula Financing. http://www.fin.gc.ca/budtoce/2004/budliste.htm. Government of Canada. First Ministers’ Meeting. Press Release, October 26, 2004. Prime Minister Announces New Equalization and Territorial Funding Formula Framework. http://www.scics.gc.ca/cinfo04/800043004_e.pdf. Government of New Brunswick. Fiscal Imbalance and Equalization: A New Brunswick Perspective. 2001. Government of New Brunswick. Submission to the Standing Senate Committee on National Finance in regards to the Equalization Program, October 17, 2001. Senate of Canada. http://www.gnb.ca/0158/speeches/pk-1852e.pdf. Government of New Brunswick. New Brunswick’s Perspective on the Equalization Program. 2005. http://www.eqtff-pfft.ca/submissions/ LaReformeFederaleProposeeDeLaPerequation.pdf. Government of Saskatchewan. Equalization Reform: A Fair Deal for Saskatchewan. 2005. http://www.eqtff-pfft.ca/submissions/GovernmentOfSaskatchewan.pdf. Government of the United States. United States Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. Measures of State and Local Fiscal Capacity and Tax Effort. 1962. Graham, John F. Intergovernmental Fiscal Relationships: Fiscal Adjustment in a Federal Country. Canadian Tax Paper no. 40, Canadian Tax Foundation, 1964. Grubel, Herbert. What’s Wrong with Equalization:
Social Insurance and Moral Hazard. Atlantic Institute
for Market Studies, April 2002. Hobson, Paul A.R., and St-Hilaire, France. Toward Sustainable Federalism: Reforming Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements. Institute for Research on Public Policy, 1993. Hobson, Paul A.R. Equalization and the Treatment
of Non-Renewable Resources. Atlantic Institute
for Market Studies, April 2002. Hobson, Paul A. R. What Do We Already Know About The Appropriate Design For A Fiscal Equalization Program in Canada and How Well Are We Doing? Institute of Intergovernmental Relations, Queen’s University, Working Paper 2002 (6). http://www.iigr.ca/pdf/publications/130_What_do_we_Already_Know_.pdf. Ontario Institute for Competitiveness and Prosperity. Fixing Fiscal Federalism. Working Paper No. 8, October 17, 2005. http://www.competeprosper.ca/public/wp08.pdf. Kaufman, Martin, Swagel, Phillip, and Dunaway, Steven. Regional Convergence and the Role of Federal Transfers
in Canada. International Monetary Fund. Working Paper 03-97, 2003. Kitchen, Harry M. Property Taxation in Canada. Canadian Tax Foundation, Canadian Tax Paper no. 92, 1992. Kitchen, Harry. Expenditure Needs Measures in Provincial/Territorial Unconditional Grants to Local Governments in Canada. Trent University, 2005. Lazar, Harvey; Banting, Keith; Boadway, Robin; Cameron, David; and St-Hilaire, France. Federal-Provincial Relations and Health Care: Reconstructing the Partnership. Health Canada and Queen’s University, 2002. Lazar, Harvey. Opening Statement before the Standing Senate Committee on National Finance. Senate of Canada, Wednesday, March 31, 2004. Lazar, Harvey. (ed.) Canadian Fiscal Arrangements: What Works, What Might Work Better. Institute of Intergovernmental Relations, Queen’s University, 2005. Laurent, Stephen, and Vaillancourt, François. Federal-Provincial Transfers for Social Programs in Canada: Their Status. Institute for Research on Public Policy. Working Paper Series, 2004-07, 2004. Locke, Wade, and Hobson Paul. An Examination of the Interaction between Natural Resource Revenues and Equalization Payments: Lessons for Atlantic Canada. Institute for Research on Public Policy, Working Paper Series no. 2004-10, 2004. http://www.irpp.org/wp/archive/wp2004-10.pdf. Locke, Wade. Advice to the Expert Panel on Equalization. Memorial University, 2005. http://www.eqtff-pfft.ca/submissions/Locke.pdf. Mansell, Robert; Schlenker, Ron; and Anderson, John. Energy, Fiscal Balances and National Sharing. Institute for Sustainable Energy, Environment and Economy, University of Calgary, Backgrounder, November 18, 2005. http://www.iseee.ca/images/pdf/Backgrounder1_18Nov2005_2column.pdf. Marchildon, Gregory P. Understanding Equalization: Is it Possible? 2005. Canadian Public Administration 420-28, vol. 48, no. 3, 2006. Marshall, Jim. Seven Issues in Equalization: A Discussion. Saskatchewan Institute of Public Policy, 2005. MacNevin, Alex. Comments of the Core Questions of the Expert Panel on Equalization and Territorial Formula Financing, 2005. http://www.eqtff-pfft.ca. McKenzie, Kenneth J. Reflections on the Political Economy of Fiscal Federalism in Canada. C.D. Howe Institute, 2005. http://www.cdhowe.org/pdf/workingpaper_4.pdf. Meekison, J.P., (ed.), Canadian Federalism: Myth or Reality? Methuen, 1971. Mieszkowski, Peter. Taxation of Natural Resources. In Fiscal Federalism and the Taxation of Natural Resources. Charles McLure and Peter Mieszkowski (eds.). Lexington Books, 1983. Mieszkowski, Peter, and Musgrave, Richard A. Federalism, Grants, and Fiscal Equalization. National Tax Journal,
239-60, vol. 52, no. 2, 1999. Mills, K.E.; Percy, M.B.; and Wilson, L.S. The Influence of Fiscal Incentive on Interregional Migration. Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 207-29, vol. 6, no. 2, 1983. Mintz, Jack, and Poschmann, Finn. Follow the Cash: Changing Equalization to Promote Sound Budgeting and Prosperity. C.D. Howe Institute, Backgrounder no. 85, 2004. http://www.cdhowe.org/pdf/backgrounder_85.pdf. Morris, Alan. Background Paper on Commonwealth/ State/Local Government Relations in Australia. Government of Australia, Commonwealth Grants Commission, 2005. Neumann, Ronald H. Submission the Expert Panel
on Equalization Territorial Formula Financing, 2005
and 2006. Ontario Chamber of Commerce, Fairness in Confederation. Fiscal Imbalance: Driving Ontario to“Have-Not” Status. August 2005. Ontario Chamber of Commerce. Fairness in Confederation. Fiscal Imbalance: Palmer, John. Equalization at a Crossroads. Mount Allison University, 2004. http://www.mun.ca/harriscentre/acea_paper_second_revision_2004.pdf. Perry, Harvey J. A Fiscal History of Canada – The Postwar Years. Canadian Tax Foundation, Canadian Tax Paper no. 85, 1989. Perry, David B. Financing the Canadian Federation, 1867 to 1995: Setting the Stage for Change. Canadian Tax Foundation. Canadian Tax Paper no. 102, 1997. Plourde, André. Natural Resource Revenues and Equalization: A Partial Overview of Selected Issues. University of Alberta. Submission to the Expert Panel
on Equalization and Territorial Formula Financing. August 2005. Poschmann, Finn. The Fiscal Background to a Fiscal Gap. C.D. Howe Institute. Working Paper no.1, September 2005. http://www.cdhowe.org/pdf/workingpaper_1.pdf. Protti, Gerry. Overview of Medium Term Energy Outlook. 2005. Richards, John, and Pratt, Larry. Prairie Capitalism: Power and Influence in the New West. McClelland and Stewart, 1979. Robson, William. Of money, Power and Politics: Time to Straighten Out a Federal-Provincial Mess. In The Howe Report. January/February, 2006. Ryan, Annette. Equalization: Neither Welfare Trap Nor Helping Hand. Atlantic Institute for Market Studies, April 2002. http://www.aims.ca/library/welfare.pdf. Sale, Tim and Associates. Expenditure Needs and Equalization: Feasibility Study on Primary and Secondary Education. Department of Finance Canada Working Paper, 1993. Scott, Anthony. Natural Resource Revenues: A Test of Federalism. University of British Columbia Press, 1976. Selinger G. and R. Neumann, Strengthening Intergovernmental Fiscal Arrangements in Canada in H. Lazar (ed.) Canadian Fiscal Arrangements: What Works, What Might Work Better, McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2005. Shah, Anwar. The Reform of Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in Developing and Emerging Market Economies. Policy and Research Series Report no. 23, chap 1. World Bank, 1994. Shah, Anwar. A Fiscal Need Approach to Equalization. Canadian Public Policy 99-115, vol. 22, no. 2, 1996. Shah, Anwar. A Framework for Evaluating Alternate Institutional Arrangements for Fiscal Equalization Transfers. World Bank, 2005. Shah, Anwar. Institutional Arrangements for Fiscal Equalization Transfers: Presentation to the Expert Panel
on Equalization and TFF, 2005. Smart, Michael. Taxation and Deadweight Loss in a System of Intergovernmental Transfers. University of Toronto, Department of Economics, Working Paper no. 96-03, 1996. Smart, Michael, and Bird, Richard. Federal Fiscal Arrangements in Canada: An analysis of incentives, in Proceedings of the National Tax Association National Conference on Taxation, 1996. Smart, Michael. Redistribution, Risk and Incentives in Equalization: A Comparison of RTS and Macro Approaches. Institute of Intergovernmental Relations, Queen’s University, 2002. Smart, Michael, and Bucovetsky, Sam. The Efficiency Consequences of Local Revenue Equalization: Tax Competition and Tax Distortions. Journal of Public Economic Theory Vol. 8, no. 1, January 2006. http://www.economics.utoronto.ca/msmart/wp/equalization.pdf. Smart, Michael. Equalization and Stabilization.
Canadian Public Policy 195-208, vol. 30, no. 2, 2004. Smart, Michael. Federal Transfers: Principles, Practice, and Prospects. C.D. Howe Institute, 2005. Smart, Michael. Some Notes on Equalization Reform. University of Toronto, 2005. http://www.eqtff-pfft.ca/submissions/Smart.pdf. Snodden, Tracy. On Equalization and Incentives: An Empirical Assessment. Working Paper Series, Department of Economics, Wilfrid Laurier University, 2003. http://info.wlu.ca/~wwwsbe/sbe2000/html/sbe_working_paper_series/ Snodden, Tracy. Equalization: Moving Forward under the New Framework. Wilfrid Laurier University, 2005. http://www.eqtff-pfft.ca/submissions/EQpaperfinal.pdf. Spahn, Paul Bernd. Maintaining Fiscal Equilibrium in a Federation: Germany. University of Frankfurt, Germany, August, 2001. pspahn@wiwi.uni-frankfurt.de. St-Hilaire, France. Fiscal Gaps and Imbalances: The New Fundamentals of Canadian Federalism. Institute of Intergovernmental Relations, Queen’s University, 2005. http://www.irpp.org/miscpubs/archive/050526e.pdf. Taylor, Amy. Chris Severson-Baker and Mark Winfield. When the Government is the Landlord: Economic Rent, Non-Renewable Permanent Funds, and Environmental Impacts Related to Oil and Gas Developments in Canada. Ter-Minassian, Teresa, (ed.), Fiscal Federalism in Theory and in Practice. International Monetary Fund, 1997. Usher, Dan. The Uneasy Case for Equalization Payments. Fraser Institute, 1995. Usher, Dan. The Case for Switching to a Macro Formula. Institute of Intergovernmental Relations, Queen’s University, Working Paper 2002(4), 2002. http://www.iigr.ca/pdf/publications/128_The_Case_for_Switching_t.pdf. Usher, Dan. The Representative Tax Structure, The Macro Formula and Fiscal Capacity. Queen’s University, 2005. Vaillancourt, François, and Bird, Richard. Expenditure-based Equalization Transfers. Rotman School of Management, International Tax Program, University Vaillancourt, François. Reforming Equalization in Canada: Some Observations. Université de Montréal, 2005. Westin, Warren and Webb, Mary. Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements: Time to get Back to Basics. Scotiabank Group Economic Directions, June 15, 2005. Wilson Leonard S. Equalization, Efficiency and Migration – Watson Revisited. Canadian Public Policy vol. 29, no. 40, 2003. Wilson, Leonard S. Key Questions on Equalization: A Discussion. Submission to the Expert Panel on Equalization and Territorial Formula Financing. University of Alberta, 2005. http://www.eqtff-pfft.ca/submissions/Wilson.pdf. Winchester, Bruce. Equalization Reform That Works: Taking Seriously the Idea that Incentives Matter.
Atlantic Institute for Market Studies, 2005. Zuker, Richard C., and T. Russell Robinson. Fixing Territorial Formula Financing, 2005. http://eqtff-pfft.ca/submissions/ZukerandRobinson.pdf.
|
||||
 |
||
| Dernière mise à jour : 2013-05-22 |  |
Avis importants |